Posts Tagged Apple

The iPad

As a member of the blogosphere, I consider it my duty to post about the latest piece of hardware to be unleashed on the public by the folks at 1, Infinite Loop, California (for the uninitiated, that’s where Apple is headquartered.

Anyhoo, it’s called the iPad, which, according to Apple, is a market filler between the iPhone and the Macbook Air (further known as MBA). The rather disturbing thing about the keynote speech by Steve Jobs was the fact that the product’s development was driven by a gap in the market, not a consumer-based need. Which is slightly worrying. Still, can’t blame Apple for making sure that they had all bases covered.

Apple iPad

The specs of the iPad are as follows (I’ve lifted them from this PCWorld article):

  • 9.7″ IPS display (different and better than a standard TFT display because it allows a much wider view angle)
  • 1 Ghz semi-inhouse production processor (since Apple bought PA Semi, you can’t really call it a completely indigenous design)
  • 16, 32, 64GB flash memory
  • WiFi (802.11n), 3G, Bluetooth
  • Speaker, mic, accelerometer (d’uh), compass (?)
  • About 10 hours of battery life

Now, apart from these mundane specs, the question I want to raise is this – who will buy the iPad.

Firstly, there’s a legion of Apple fanboys out there, who will undoubtedly sell their own mothers to get their hands on one. But apart from that, what killer features does it have to offer? At 9.56 by 7.47 by 0.5 inches, and 1.5 to 1.6 pounds, it’s not exactly compact. In the sense that you can’t slip it into a pocket. Nor can you actually carry it around in a laptop bag, because let’s face it, it isn’t a laptop.

It’s a pad.

If I was gifted one, I would be confused. It doesn’t offer me as much functionality as let’s say a MBA, nor does it offer me the portability of an iPhone (I have neither). I can’t get a wrist strap or lanyard for that.

Unless of course, the iPad does for the tablet market what the iPod did for the MP3 player market. For those of you who remain blissfully unaware, Apple introduced the iPod in 2001, and was single-handedly responsible for reviving the slow MP3 player market. As of today, tablets do ship, but in relatively small numbers. You can get a few offerings from HP, Lenovo, Dell etc, but they’re basically just ultra-thin laptops with screens you can scribble on.

Agreed, Steve Ballmer did showcase a potential iPad-rival from HP some time back, but the fact remains that the iPad is out now, and the HP Slate’s release date is TBA. So, maybe the shiny anodised aluminium is going to attract people like jackdaws, and despite the lack of a direct market audience, it will sell like…like…like the iPhone did (there isn’t a better analogy).

Recent studies have shown that hot cakes are no longer as popular as they were once thought to be.

Tags: , , ,

Another batch of iPods

This time around, Apple has chosen to update almost it’s entire line-up in one go.

The Shuffle, the screen-less tiny player get’s a range of colours. To be honest, I still haven’t seen the current generation shuffle, but it looks mighty small when you look at how big the hands are in the pic…prices are Rs. 3,700/$59 for the 2GB model and Rs. 4,800/$79 for the 4GB Shuffle.

The Touch, to be honest, has just been retouched, that’s all. No major updates to speak of, as of such. The price starts at Rs. 12,400/$199 for the 8GB model, which ramps up to Rs. 18,400/$299 for the 32GB model and a new 64GB model at Rs. 24,400/$399 (yikes).

But what I’m really interested is, the iPod Nano has undergone some more substantial changes, which could translate into similar changes in the Classic. First and foremost, tho. It also has a feature which was missed sorely in earlier iterations of the iPod – an in-built radio. Agreed, a third party accessory allowed a user to listen to FM radio, but it needed to be in-built to be truly useful. Apart from that, it seems that the Nike+iPod relationship might be coming to an end, because Apple has gone ahead and used the in-built accelerometer in the Nano to create it’s own inbuilt Pedometer and fitness application.

Apart from that iTunes 9 has been released as well. I’m downloading it right now, and its setup is even more massive, weighing in at 88.8MB. I hope that it’s worth it… Will post on that later

e Nano now has a VGA (640×480) camera, which records in H.264 with AAC audi

Tags: , , , ,

iPod Nano : Déja Vu – Part 2

Before I forget, let me also mention that like the old Nano 2G’s battery, which lasted around 30 hours. The Nano 4G has also managed something around that. Here’s a detailed report:

  • 10:00 – Fully charged, on repeat and shuffle.
  • 10:30 – Went to the shops with the iPod. A certain amount of un-Holding and volume changing ensued.
  • 17:00 – About 1/5-1/4 of the battery gone.
  • 21:00 – Stuffed myself at dinner, had to walk it off, took the iPod. Un-holding and song changing followed.
  • 23:00 - Went to sleep – still about half full!
  • Next day – 8:15 - Still at about 1/3.
  • 10:00 – 24 hours done, about 1/4-1/5 left.
  • 13:00 – Dropped to danger zone.
  • 16:00 – Dead

So that’s about 30 hours of non-stop playback, with some amount of me fiddling about with it. Which is not bad, considering the advertised battery life, like the old iPod is 24 hours.

The Nano 4G also has a nifty feature called Energy Saver. What it does, is that if you leave the iPod untouched, while playing some music, after some time, it’ll turn off the screen to save energy. I haven’t tested video playback battery life, and I don’t intend to any time soon.

P.S. Now this is a post I could’ve copied…

Tags: , , , , ,

iPod Nano : Déja vu

This post is about the 8GB iPod Nano 4G that I won at the Puffin Quiz. The simplest thing for me to do would be just copy-paste my last review of the iPod, with a few changes here and there, but no, this iPod attracts a totally fresh review. So here goes…

iPod Nano 4G

iPod Nano 4G

First off, let me tell you that there’s a very different feeling about receiving an iPod, that’s very hard to describe. Apple’s worked very hard to get that sort of mentality into all iPod customers. An iPod leaves is supposed to leave you in awe. You marvel at its simplicity, and at the same time realise that it is one of the best portable media players out there in the market.

Non-iPod owners tend to hold the opinion that it’s an overpriced piece of shit.

Of course, the non-believers are right…Apple does try its best to cash into the iPod-is-next-to-God mentality, by ripping you off big time. But since I’ve won this iPod, I really don’t care very much about the price tag. Incidentally, it was around 10k, according to the price label. I’ve got a blue 8GB model. Apple tends to build a shell around you, once you’re part of the family. Once an Apple fan, always an Apple fan. iTunes is forced upon you, as the only way to manage your iPod, which of course is complete nonsense, there are a number of alternatives like Winamp and Floola, just to name a few. Anyway, back to the iPod.

I’ve always liked the way Apple packages the iPod. They try to be very minimalistic, providing just one piece of paper as a ‘manual’. The idea is, of course, is that the iPod is so user-friendly, that it doesn’t need a manual, which is sort of true. One of the most intuitive interfaces in this technological era. The iPod Nano 4G has gone back to the shape of the Nano 1G and 2G, being longer lengthwise, rather than breadthwise. This, in my opinion is a good move. I considered the first video Nano i.e. the 3G, to be rather fat and ungainly. I always liked the Nano because of the way it would fit into your palm perfectly. I was always a bit iffy about the 3G. Well, the 4G certainly corrects that. The finish is typical anodized-aluminium.

Now, all the iPods I’ve (semi-)owned – a 512 MB Shuffle, a 2GB Nano, a 4GB Nano, have been white/silver. But I have to say, seeing a Nano in deep blue is something altogether different. It just looks so beautiful, especially with the new curved design, with light striking it at different angles. One more thing, the curved and oh-so-thin-I’d-barter-my-kidney design is actually just visual trickery. The shape is like a concave lens, thin at the ends, but bulging towards the middle. The middle thickness is about the same as my old 2G Nano. The screen of course is a 2″ (diagonal) 320×240 LCD. Compared to my 2G Nano, the screen takes up much more space on the iPod, about 3/5th of the front. The clickwheel is almost the same size as my old iPod. The screen has a glass cover, but unlike my old Nano, it isn’t recessed into the body, so if I drag it across a table, which I won’t, it will get badly scratched. Also, it is a mega smudge magnet.

Now, one of the niggles – the ‘Hold’ button. Now, I’ve always identified this as a trouble spot on almost all iPods. This button, on all iPods, feels as if it’s just going to fall apart after some time, and indeed, I have seen this happening on iPods belonging to my friends. On the 4G Nano, it is a very sturdy thing. Apple’s design department has replaced the traditional plastic job with a round metal switch. It does take some amount of struggling to use this button, and this is exactly what worries me. Assuming that I accidentally use too much force, or if my finger is at the wrong angle or something like that, I could render one of the most important controls on the iPod useless. I consider it important because it is very important to save battery life. And saving battery is important because replacing batteries in an iPod is not as simple as it may seem. Theses batteries are not user-serviceable, and Apple Service Centres charge and arm and a leg for that.

Now, let me come to the actual interface of the iPod. The large screen, with the better resolution has made stuff much, much better. You can see more options on the menus. Plus, on the main menu, there’s this new feature called the Preview Panel, which allows you to see album art, among other things. One of the things I noticed was that the clickwheel seemed a bit more clunky, as compared to my old 2G. By clunky, what I mean is that scrolling, changing volume et al, are a bit more digital, less analogue, if you get what I mean. It isn’t a smooth process… Another small niggle…maybe it’s just be taking some time to get used to the new positioning of the clickwheel.

When you play a song, instead of being greeted by a white screen with a small portion of it being taken up by album art, and the rest being info about the song, now the album art is predominant, taking up around 8/10th of the screen space. The only reason Apple could do this is because of the resolution as well as the screen orientation. Anyway, it looks good this way. The song name is displayed in small letters at the bottom. Also, now you can choose the shuffle mode by pressing the center button 3-4, and using an iPhone-style slider, which I think is a very good idea. Lyrics also look much better as compared to my old Nano 2G, with album art and song name accompanying the lyrics.

Genius is also a pretty good feature…just select any song, and let your iPod make a playlist of similar songs. It isn’t always right, but then, nobody’s perfect, right? Just press the center button 2 times and use the slider. Remember that this feature will only work if you have updated Genius for your iTunes library, which you can only do if you have an account on the iTunes store (doesn’t matter if it’s Indian or US).

I think it’s time I mention that this time around, Apple has put an accelerometer in the iPod Nano. Cover flow takes full advantage of this, and if you tilt your iPod 90 degrees, you’ll enter Cover Flow mode, which shows all your albums. I personally don’t use this too much, because it takes up a bit of battery, which I’ll explain later. Another accelerometer funtion is the Shake to Shuffle function – possibly one of the most addictive features. When your Nano is not on Hold, just shake your iPod to shuffle all songs. In fact, I’m so addicted to it, I put my iPod in the pocket of my shorts and just do a little jig! Honestly, it works. Please, just make sure you have strong seams in your pockets, otherwise you’ll have a nasty time trying to explain to an Apple salesman exactly how your iPod smashed itself into itsy bitsy pieces (which it won’t, because it does have some structural strength).

One other niggle I noticed, was to do with the screen. It’s a very nice screen, with the backlight. But I’m a battery freak…I don’t want my iPod to die prematurely. So I like to disable the backlight, and just do with ambient lighting, tilting the iPod in the right direction to see what’s on the screen. Thing is, on the 4G Nano, this simply won’t work. I don’t know if it’s to do with the curved glass on the screen, or if it’s Apple’s new strategy for planned obsolence of iPods, but I simply have to keep the backlight on, albeit for only 2 seconds. But the thing that really winds me up is that in my old Nano, I could enable an option on my Main Menu, from where I could simply turn off or turn on my backlight temporarily (as long as I needed it). Apple seems to have disabled this option, which means that to do anything with the backlight, I have to go into the settings. This has confirmed my suspicions that Apple wants iPods to die young, so that you have to buy another one. This is only real problem I have with the Nano 4G.

Since this is a Nano which plays Videos as well, the Main Menu also contains a Video option (d’oh). In case you didn’t know, you can customise what options are included in the Main Menu in the Settings. Anyway, as always with iPods, converting videos into H.264/MP4 is the only hassle (apart from keeping duplicate versions of files on your PC). The iPod Nano is pretty good with videos, and if you categorise them the right way as Movies, TV Shows or Music Videos, it’ll be even easier. The iPod also allows you to adjust the brightness while playing a video, which I think is a good thing. But one major problem is that the backlight stays at that brightness even after the video stops playing. What’s more, the backlight timer is reset to 10 seconds, which is really annoying.

Before I forget, the iPod has a couple of games as well, of which I found Maze the best, because it uses the accelerometer. Sorta like the little mazes you can find on top of a pencil box!

Audio quality is top notch, as usual. In fact, there’s something extra special about the iPod earphones/audio output. The earphones look visually identical to the ones I got with my last iPod, but they sound much much better…dunno if it’s got to do with the earphones or the iPod, or the fact that I haven’t listened to music on iPod earphones for almost 9 months now, but the music sounds amazing.

In conclusion, I think it’s an iPod, which it is. Period.

Tags: , , , ,

DIY : Escape from iTunes

Some people don’t really like iTunes, but are entrapped, mainly because they’ve got an iPod or perhaps their libraries are too integrated with iTunes. But it really isn’t all that hard to move to Windows Media Player, WinAmp, Real Player or one of the other alternatives.

First, try to get all your music in one place. This might be unneccesary if you’re like me, and have your entire collection in one folder (actually, in my case, partition). This helps when you’re adding the files to another media player. Do this by going to the Edit menu -> Preferences. Click on the Advanced Tab, and set the iTunes library location to the place you want all your music to go. Now, clik on File -> Library -> Consolidate Library. Will take some time, but will make sure that all the music in your iTunes library is now organised in one folder.

I’m trusting that you didn’t try and play video with iTunes. It is possibly the worst player for video. Apparently it refuses to take video codecs from the OS’s codec library, and will only support .mov (QuickTime) and .mp4 files. I can’t say about podcasts, mainly because I don’t really use them too much.

All you need to do is add that folder to your new media player’s media library and/or watch list. A watch list will monitor that folder for any changes, and automatically add new media to the library as and when you add it to that folder.Now, the main problem arises when you’re thinking of moving metadata. This can be a pain with iTunes, mainly because it doesn’t believe in keeping stuff like playlists, play counts and ratings as metadata with your music files, but it keeps it hidden away in that crappy iTunes library XML file. That place looks like a complete junkyard. And I can see why searches take so long in iTunes. Anyway, there’s a solution I stumbled across – MusicBridge.

Actually, this only works for iTunes -> Windows Media Player. It’s a tool which copies all that info from your iTunes Library to your WMP library. All I had to do was just add the media files into the WMP library, and then run this program which did the rest for me. I had an option to copy just General Metadata, Ratings, Playlists, Artwork and more such stuff. It could also copy stuff from WMP -> iTunes, but such a person would be a moron, right?

In it’s defense, iTunes does seem to use less RAM in Windows 7 for some reason. Apparently, window management’s gotten better, and this means that it needs less of private memory. But that’s about it…;-)

Tags: , , ,

The Tech Nut is using WP-Gravatar